Tag Archives: public defenders

Minnesota Senate passes increased funding for public defenders

Minnesota Lawyer (subscription required) reports on the bill for public defenders’ funding.  The background of the funding for public defenders is as follows.

In 2008, public defenders were funded through attorney’s registration fees.  The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld this type of funding.  Through this funding, the state Board of Public Defense was able to generate around $1.9 million annually.  This request was reapproved in 2011.

However, in December, the state Board of Public Defense withdrew its request to earmark funding from the attorney registration fee.    This decision came in December, when various committees and group sections of the Minnesota State Board Association removed its support for the petition.

On Tuesday, April 16th, 2013, the state Senate passed a judiciary funding bill that increases funding for public defenders.  The bill provides $5 million for increased employee salary and benefits for public defenders.  The bill also provides $5.6 million for new public defenders positions that will reduce caseloads.  The Senate bill was passed by 47-18 votes.

The Senate Judiciary Finance Division Chairman Ron Latz (DFL-St. Louis Park) stated that the bill helps alleviate a public defender system that is “overworked, overburdened, [and] has some of the biggest caseloads in the country.”

via Minnesota Senate passes increased funding for public defenders | Minnesota Lawyer.

Leave a comment

Filed under attorneys, courts, District Court, employment, Pending Legislation, wage

TN County agrees to reform judicial system

The ABA Journal Blog reports on a ground-breaking agreement between TN Shelby County and the US Dep’t of Justice.  The agreement regards the juvenile judicial system, includes the following provisions:

  • Teens will be advised of their Miranda Rights;
  • Teens will get a probable cause hearing on detention within 48 hours; and
  • Teens will get help from specially trained public defenders.

This agreement arose from a federal investigation which found the following:

  • Black teens were twice as likely as white teens to be detained;
  • Black teens were transferred to adult criminal court for low-level offenses;
  • Black teens were subjected to unnecessary restraints;
  • Black teens were not advised of their Miranda rights; and
  • Black teens were held in detention on weekends and holidays because no probable cause hearings were held.

via A Tennessee County Agrees to Grant New Protections to Accused Juveniles in Template for Reform – News – ABA Journal.

Leave a comment

Filed under civil rights, legal decision