Campaign Disclosure Law

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upholds campaign disclosure law

In a 2-1 decision, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a Minnesota campaign finance law that requires extensive disclosure of independent expenditures on behalf of candidates and restricts corporate contributions to state candidates and political parties.

Polinaut over at MPR summarizes Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life v. Swanson:

The case, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life vs. Swanson, follows the Citizens United Supreme Court decision in 2009, which freed corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money to support and oppose candidates for federal office.

Following that decision, the Legislature passed strict disclosure laws for corporations, which revealed Target’s support for the group MN Forward, which in turn supported Tom Emmer’s campaign for the governor’s office.

MCCL, which opposes abortion, along with the Taxpayer’s League of Minnesota and a travel agency, sued to block the law, arguing that the disclosure laws violated the groups’ free speech rights and created burdensome new rules to adhere to. (Perhaps not coincidentally, the groups are represented by Jim Bopp, who also advised Citizens United.)

The court disagreed with the groups’ arguments, writing, “Minnesota’s provisions collectively impose no materially greater burden on corporations than the disclosure laws at issue in Citizen United.”

via Capitol View | Minnesota Public Radio.


Leave a comment

Filed under legal decision

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s