Same sex marriage ban legislation update

Same sex marriage ban is one step away from reaching ballot

A constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage is one step away from being put on the 2012 ballot. The House Rules Committee narrowly passed the bill by one vote 13-12. Rep. Tim Kelly, R-Red Wing, joined every Democrat in voting against it.

Opponents say changing the constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman would open up a painful and divisive debate across Minnesota. DFL Representative Michael Paymar says it would also go against the tide of increasing acceptance toward same-sex couples.

“The public is changing,” Paymar said. “Young people are changing. People don’t feel the same way they did 10 to 14 year ago.”

The bill’s sponsor, Republican Steve Gottwalt, told the panel he rejected the argument that the referendum was discriminatory and restrictive.

“Discussing taking away rights from people? No,” Gottwalt said. “This is current state law. The desire is simply to put before the people, ‘Should we be more permanently placing it where politicians and judges cannot redefine it?'”

Minnesota law already prohibits gay marriage but supporters of the bill say it would make that ban stronger, and protect it from judicial rulings.

The Minnesota Senate already passed the measure. If the House follows suit voters will decide if the Minnesota Consitution should be amended to define marriage as between one man and one woman. If a majority of the voters voting in that election vote yes, the measure will be put in the constitution.

Here’s the roll call:

Republicans voting Yes

Dean, Daudt, Anderson, Banaian, Hamilton, Hoppe, Howes, Mack, McNamara, Nornes, Peppin, Scott, Westrom

Democrats voting No

Pelowski, Benson, Brynaert, Hilstrom, Knuth, Laine, Lillie, Murphy, Norton, Paymar, Thissen

Republicans voting No


Democrats voting Yes


via Capitol View | Minnesota Public Radio.



Filed under Pending Legislation

3 responses to “Same sex marriage ban legislation update

  1. James

    What is the required percentage of votes for a constitutional amendment?

    Personally I would like to see more things put up for vote by voters, not less. However that is not reflective of how easy things should be to be constitutional amendment.

    However, making it a true “vote of the people”… isn’t that the whole idea of a democracy?

  2. When an amendment is proposed on a ballot, it needs to pass by a majority voting at the election. This means that if someone does not vote for this particular amendment in any way and still votes in the election, the blank ballot is considered a “no.” So in order for the amendment to pass, the majority of the residents voting in the election have to actively vote “yes.”

    If you want to see some of the amendments that have been put on the ballot, you can go here.

  3. I also forgot to add other issues that might appear on the ballot depending on how the Legislature votes include:

    • Requiring a photo ID amendment for voting.

    • Amendment requiring any state tax increase to be approved by a 60 percent supermajority in the Legislature.

    • Amendment that would limit spending to 98 percent of state revenues.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s