The ABA is supporting legislation to allow veterans who were discharged under the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell to request a change in their military records.
“Restore Honor to Service Members Act,” H.R. 2839, will ensure that veterans who were discharged solely because of their sexual orientation and did not receive an “honorable” characterization of service can have the opportunity to request their characterization be upgraded. In addition, those who did receive an honorable discharge would be able to remove any reference to sexual orientation from their records by requesting a review.
This bill was introduced on July 25, 2013 and was referred to committee. Since July 25, 2013 there has been no movement. The ABA President’s letter, dated November 21, urges the subcommittee to take action.
via Vets discharged under Dont Ask, Dont Tell should be allowed to seek change in records, ABA says.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (en banc) ruled that an iron worker who was subjected to gay slurs and simulated sex because he failed to conform to the employer’s male stereotypes was discriminated against under Title VII.
In EEOC v. Boh Bros. Constr. Co., No. 11-30770 (5th Cir. Sept. 27, 2013), the court reviewed the jury’s findings and awarded damages. The Fifth Circuit found that taking the case as a whole, a jury could have found that the employee was harassed because he did not fall under the “manly-man stereotype.”
This case arose when a worker, Kerry Woods, was subjected to sex harassment. Woods was often sexual derogatory terms regarding Woods’ sexuality. In addition, the superintendent also exposed himself when Woods was going to the bathroom, and made sexual innuendo comments to Woods. When these actions were brought to the employer, the superintendent told the general superintendent that he didn’t care for Woods because he was “different” and “didn’t fit in.”
After trial the jury found that this verbal and physical harassment occurred daily. The jury awarded Woods $200,000 in compensatory damages and $250,000 in punitive damages.
via Harassed for being unmanly? En banc court sees Title VII violation; dissent sees clean-talk enforcer.