Tag Archives: threats

Texas election day and arresting OSCE for supervision

The Texas attorney general warned the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe that its election observers could be arrested and criminally charged if they come within 100 feet of a polling place on Election Day.

In a Tuesday letter to the OSCE, Attorney General Greg Abbott said the observers have no jurisdiction in Texas.

“While it remains unclear exactly what your monitoring is intended to achieve, or precisely what tactics you will use to achieve the proposed monitoring, OSCE has stated publicly that it will visit polling stations on Election Day as part of its monitoring plan,” Abbott wrote.

“In April, you reportedly met with a group of organizations that have filed lawsuits challenging election integrity laws enacted by the Texas Legislature. One of those organizations, Project Vote, is closely affiliated with ACORN, which collapsed in disgrace after its role in a widespread voter-registration fraud scheme was uncovered.”

Abbott said OSCE has called voter-identification laws a barrier to the right to vote.

A federal appeals court in August court struck down Texas’ voter identification law, saying it disenfranchises minorities and the poor.

The law, enacted by the Republican-dominated Legislature in 2011, required Texas voters to provide with photo identification, which was limited to a driver’s license, personal identification card or concealed handgun license issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety, a U.S. passport, a U.S. military ID or a U.S. citizenship certificate.

Abbott, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and the Legislature claims the law was needed to prevent voter fraud.

Abbott wrote to the OSCE: “The OSCE may be entitled to its opinions about Voter ID laws, but your opinion is legally irrelevant in the United States, where the Supreme Court has already determined that Voter ID laws are constitutional. If OSCE members want to learn more about our election processes so they can improve their own democratic systems, we welcome the opportunity to discuss the measures Texas has implemented to protect the integrity of elections. However, groups and individuals from outside the United States are not allowed to influence or interfere with the election process in Texas.”

Abbott’s letter concludes: “It may be a criminal offense for OSCE’s representatives to maintain a presence within 100 feet of a polling place’s entrance. Failure to comply with these requirements could subject the OSCE’s representatives to criminal prosecution for violating state law.”

The OSCE, based in Vienna, Austria, is a multinational group with particular interest in arms control, border management, human trafficking, elections and education, according to its website.

via Courthouse News Service.

Leave a comment

Filed under civil rights

9th Cir: tenants and landlords

San Francisco landlords cannot fight a voter initiative that makes it illegal to force out tenants with cash and threats, the 9th Circuit ruled Tuesday.

The Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute (SPOSFI) and others sued the city and county of San Francisco in 2009, seeking an injunction to stop Proposition M, an ordinance approved by voters the previous year prohibiting “residential landlords and their agents from attempting, ‘in bad faith’ to ‘coerce the tenant to vacate with offers of payments to vacate which are accompanied with threats or intimidation,” according to the ruling.

The group, composed of about 1,500 local landlords, argued that the ordinance violated the free-speech and petition clauses of the First Amendment.

U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup dismissed the group’s claims, finding that it had no standing to challenge the statute and that the city had a valid interest in regulating their actions. A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit affirmed unanimously. The judges said the landlords had not shown that they would be harmed by the law.

“There is no allegation on which to base an inference that any of SPOSFI’s members intend to engage in conduct even arguably proscribed by Proposition M,” wrote Senior U.S. District Judge Frederic Block, sitting on the three-judge appellate panel by designation from the Eastern District of New York. “As a matter of common sense, an allegation that a plaintiff is ‘subject to’ the challenged ordinance cannot suffice.”

via Courthouse News Service.

Leave a comment

Filed under Appellate, civil rights, courts, legal decision